Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; March 2004; v. 39; no. 1; p. 85-98; DOI: 10.1180/0009855043910122
© 2004 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NØRNBERG, P.
Right arrow Articles by GUNNLAUGSSON, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mineralogy of a burned soil compared with four anomalously red Quaternary deposits in Denmark

P. NØRNBERG1,*, U. SCHWERTMANN2, H. STANJEK3, T. ANDERSEN1 and H. P. GUNNLAUGSSON4

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 2 Lehrstuhl für Bodenkunde, Technische Universität München, D-85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany, 3 Institut für Mineralogie und Lagerstättenlehre, RWTH, D-52056 Aachen, Germany, and 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Map showing the geographical positions of Fe oxide sites.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. CIE-colour determinations. The diagram shows the natural samples compared with sectors of pure laboratory goethite and hematite. Sample designations are given in Table 2Go.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. XRD patterns of <63 µm samples from Naesset Bs1 (Fed: 10.2%), Bs2 (Fed: 17.7%) and Bs3 (Fed: 5.76%) horizons.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. XRD patterns of <63 µm samples I (Fed: 30.8%) and II (Fed: 50.4%) from Salten Skov.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Mössbauer spectra of sample I from Salten Skov. Solid lines show individual fitting of components and their sum.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. XRD patterns of <63 µm samples I (Fed: 25.2%) and II (Fed: 13.7%) from Salten.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. XRD patterns of <63 µm samples I (Fed: 40.7%), II (Fed: 39.6%) and III (Fed: 42.6%) from Pot Molle.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Mössbauer spectra of sample I from Pot Molle. Solid lines show individual fitting of components and their sum. The inset figure shows the RT spectrum scaled to show the sextet component.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. XRD patterns of <63 µm samples I (Fed: 40.0%) and II (Fed: 50.9%) from Laasby

 


View larger version (145K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. TEM image of the edge of a particle from Salten Skov I.

 


View larger version (196K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11. TEM image of part of a particle from Pot Molle I.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland