Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online 22 May 2009
Clay Minerals; March 2009; v. 44; no. 1; p. 89-112; DOI: 10.1180/claymin.2009.044.1.89
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadir, S.
Right arrow Articles by Akbulut, A.

Research Paper

Mineralogy, geochemistry and genesis of the Tasoluk kaolinite deposits in pre-Early Cambrian metamorphites and Neogene volcanites of Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

S. Kadir1,* and A. Akbulut2

1 Department of Geological Engineering, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey, and 2 The Aegean Region Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA), TR-35040 Izmir, Turkey

* E-mail: skadir_esogu{at}yahoo.com

(Received 1 February 2008; revised 18 September 2008)

The Tasoluk kaolinite deposits of Afyonkarahisar (western Anatolia) are hosted by both pre-Early Cambrian sericitic mica-chlorite schists and Neogene volcanites, the latter comprising tuffs and agglomerates. These units have been affected by hydrothermal alteration controlled by faults resulting in complex, irregular, lateral mineralogical zonation. The occurrence of a siliceous cap on altered schists and in claystone, of quartz veins in schists and tuffs, and the development of explosion cones and pit fillings indicate that alteration in both the schists and the volcanites is due to hydrothermal processes. Altered schists have generally large (locally small) Fe contents, and claystones are generally silicified and have small Fe contents. Kaolinite predominates south and west of Tasoluk, whereas high (Fe+Ti)-bearing illite + kaolinite predominate in other altered sections. The kaolinite exhibits a stacked micromorphology within altered schists, and the altered volcanites record in situ precipitation, derived from a mechanism of paired dissolution and precipitation. Illite fibres coexist with kaolinite, smectite, chlorite, mica and sericitized feldspar in markedly altered schists, revealing that the illite formed either authigenically or by conversion of smectite to illite. A relative increase in Cr+Ni and decrease in Sr+Ba in the kaolinite deposits and their schistose host rock relative to the upper level of the kaolinite deposits and their volcanic parent rocks came about by the alteration of chlorite, mica and feldspar in the sericitic mica-chlorite schists, and feldspar, glass shards and schist fragments in the volcanites as a result of extensive faulting, fracturing and hydrothermal activity during Late Miocene-Pliocene volcanism, which contributed to the development of kaolinite deposits under acidic environmental conditions. With regard to industrial applications, the low-Fe kaolinized schists are suitable for use in refractories and paper coatings, while the claystone is suitable for use in ceramics and in the white-cement industry.

KEYWORDS: Afyonkarahisar, hydrothermal alteration, illite, kaolinite, pre-Early Cambrian sericitic mica-chlorite-schist, Neogene volcanites, siliceous cap, Turkey




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
S. Kadir and F. Kart
THE OCCURRENCE AND ORIGIN OF THE SOGUT KAOLINITE DEPOSITS IN THE PALEOZOIC SARICAKAYA GRANITE-GRANODIORITE COMPLEXES AND OVERLYING NEOGENE SEDIMENTS (BILECIK, NORTHWESTERN TURKEY)
Clays and Clay Minerals, June 1, 2009; 57(3): 311 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland