|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Paper |
LGIT, Maison des Géosciences, CNRS and Université Joseph Fourier, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
* E-mail: Alain.Manceau{at}obs.ujf-grenoble.fr
(Received 31 January 2008; revised 19 June 2008)
A new structural model for ferrihydrite that challenges the standard
ferrihydrite model established by X-ray diffraction and confirmed by neutron
diffraction and single-crystal electron nanodiffraction was recently proposed
by Michel et al.
(2007a) from the simulation of
the pair distribution function obtained by Fourier transformation of
diffraction data measured at
= 0.137 Å. The new ferrihydrite
model is isostructural to akdalaite
(Al10O14(OH)2), a mineral having the
Baker-Figgis
-isomer of the Al13-Keggin structure as its
structural motif. The new model is unrealistic because: (1) it is completely
periodic (i.e. defect-free); (2), it has 20% tetravalent octahedral iron
(VIFe4+), 20% divalent tetrahedral iron
(IVFe2+), and some IVFe–O distances
equal to or larger than the VIFe3+–O distances,
thus violating Pauling's 2nd rule; (3) it does not describe X-ray
diffraction and EXAFS spectroscopic data; and, (4) it is inconsistent with
electron microscopy results and contradicts previous X-ray scattering
studies.
KEYWORDS: ferrihydrite, feroxyhite, structure, PDF, XRD, EXAFS spectroscopy, bond valence
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |