Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; March 2008; v. 43; no. 1; p. 35-54; DOI: 10.1180/claymin.2008.043.1.03
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BISHOP, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, A. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Reflectance and emission spectroscopy study of four groups of phyllosilicates: smectites, kaolinite-serpentines, chlorites and micas

J. L. BISHOP1,*, M. D. LANE2, M. D. DYAR3 and A. J. BROWN1

1 SETI Institute/NASA-Ames Research Center, 515 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA, 2 Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Fort Lowell, Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA, and 3 Mount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA

* E-mail: jbishop{at}mail.arc.nasa.gov

(Received 24 April 2007; revised 18 December 2007)

Coordinated visible/near-infrared reflectance/mid-infrared reflectance and emissivity spectra of four groups of phyllosilicates were undertaken to provide insights into the differences within and among groups of smectites, kaolinite-serpentines, chlorites and micas. Identification and characterization of phyllosilicates via remote sensing on Earth and Mars can be achieved using the OH combination bands in the 2.2–2.5 µm region and the tetrahedral SiO4 vibrations from ~8.8–12 µm (~1140–830 cm–1) and ~20–25 µm (500–400 cm–1). The sharp and well resolved OH combination bands in the 2.2–2.5 µm region provide unique fingerprints for specific minerals. Al-rich phyllosilicates exhibit OH combination bands near 2.2 µm, while these bands are observed near 2.29–2.31, 2.33–2.34 µm and near 2.35–2.37 µm for Fe3+-rich, Mg-rich and Fe2+-rich phyllosilicates, respectively. When a tetrahedral substitution of Al or Fe3+ for Si occurs, the position of the Si(Al,Fe)O4 stretching mode absorption shifts. Depending on the size of the cation, the Si(Al,Fe)O4 bending mode near 500 cm–1 is split into multiple bands that may be distinguished via hyperspectral remote sensing techniques. The tetrahedral SiO4 vibrations are also influenced by the octahedral cations, such that Al-rich, Fe-rich and Mg-rich phyllosilicates can be discriminated in reflectance and emissivity spectra based on diagnostic positions of the stretching and bending bands. Differences among formation conditions for these four groups of phyllosilicates are also discussed. Hyperspectral remote sensing can be used to identify specific phyllosilicates using electronic and vibrational features and thus provide constraints on the chemistry and formation conditions of soils.

KEYWORDS: spectroscopy, reflectance, emissivity, smectite, kaolinite, serpentine, chlorite, mica







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland