Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; December 2006; v. 41; no. 4; p. 853-861; DOI: 10.1180/0009855064140224
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAKA, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by GÜLER, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The effects of electrolyte concentration, ion species and pH on the zeta potential and electrokinetic charge density of montmorillonite

E. E. SAKA and C. GÜLER*

Ege University, Science Faculty, Chemistry Department, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

* E-mail: cetin.guler{at}ege.edu.tr

(Received 21 June 2006; revised 28 September 2006)

In this study, the influence of pH, electrolyte concentration and type of ionic species (such as LiCl, NaCl, KCl, RbCl, CsCl, CaCl2, AlCl3) on the electrokinetic properties (zeta potential and electrokinetic charge density) of montmorillonite has been quantified. The zeta potential of montmorillonite particles did not change significantly with change in pH. The valencies of the ions have proven to have a great influence on the electrokinetic behaviour of the suspension. There is a gradual decrease in the zeta potential (from –24 mV to –12 mV) with increase in monovalent electrolyte concentration (from 10–4 M to 10–1 M). At any monovalent electrolyte concentration, the magnitude of the zeta potential increased with the electrolytes in the order Li+ > Na+ > K+ > Rb+ > Cs+. The zeta potential of the montmorillonite minerals in CaCl2 solutions illustrated the same behaviour as the monovalent cations. Less negative values were obtained for the CaCl2 electrolyte (~–10 mV) due to the greater valence of the ions. A sign reversal was observed at an AlCl3 concentration of 5 x 10–4 M, and, at greater concentrations, zeta potential values had a positive sign (~20 mV).

The electrokinetic charge density of montmorillonite showed similar trends of variation in mono- and divalent electrolyte solutions. Up to concentrations of ~10–3 M, it remained practically constant at ~0.5 x 10–3 C m–2, while for greater electrolyte concentrations the negative charge produced more negative values (–16 x 10–3 C m–2). The electrokinetic charge density of montmorillonite particles was constant at low AlCl3 concentrations, but at certain concentrations it increased rapidly and changed sign to positive.

KEYWORDS: electrical double layer, electrokinetic charge density, monmorillonite, zeta potential







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland