Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; September 2006; v. 41; no. 3; p. 739-749; DOI: 10.1180/0009855064130216
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NABIOLLAHY, K.
Right arrow Articles by AYOUBI, SH.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Paper

Forms of K as a function of clay mineralogy and soil development

K. NABIOLLAHY1, F. KHORMALI1,*, K. BAZARGAN2 and SH. AYOUBI1

1 Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran, and 2 Soil and Water Research Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

* E-mail: Khormali{at}yahoo.com

(Received 9 December 2005; revised 3 April 2006)

The relationships between different pools of K, i.e. exchangeable, HNO3-extractable, mineral and total, were investigated as a function of clay mineralogy and soil development in soils of Kharkeh Research Station, Kurdestan Province, western Iran. Samples from different horizons of ten pedons were selected and analysed for clay mineralogy and K fractionation. X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that clay minerals in the soils studied were similar in type, while their abundances were different. The smectite content was significantly greater in Vertisols than in the other soils. The results of K fractionation showed that mineral K and HNO3-extractable K (exchangeable and non-exchangeable, respectively) and the clay content of the soils containing lesser illite (10–30%) were significantly different from those with more illite (30–50%). Moreover, the regression slopes between water-soluble and NH4OAc-extractable K were lower in soils with more smectite due mainly to the presence of larger specific surface areas for K sorption in smectitic soils. Based on soil evolution and different forms of K, the soils studied were grouped in two major categories: (1) Vertisols and (2) Entisols, Inceptisols and Mollisols. There were greater contents of all forms of K in Vertisols than in the other soil orders. This was mainly related to the greater clay content and the dominance of smectite in the clay fraction of Vertisols.

KEYWORDS: clay minerals, potassium, soil development, Iran







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland