Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; March 2005; v. 40; no. 1; p. 1-13; DOI: 10.1180/0009855054010151
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEERMANN, T.
Right arrow Articles by BROCKAMP, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Structure analysis of montmorillonite crystallites by convergent-beam electron diffraction

T. BEERMANN and O. BROCKAMP*

Fachgebiet Mineralogie, FB-5, Universität Bremen, Postfach 330 440, D-28334 Bremen, Germany

* E-mail: michelse{at}min.uni-bremen.de

(Received 26 August 2003; revised 12 May 2004)

The small particle size and the random stacking of layers has previously hindered systematic structure investigations of montmorillonite. By applying the convergent-beam electron diffraction mode (CBED) of a transmission electron microscope (TEM) with a beam spot of ~800 Å we were able to examine undisturbed areas of montmorillonite crystallites.

Because montmorillonite crystallites are mostly thin particles, kinematic theory can be applied and the CBED patterns can be interpreted directly, provided that the particle thickness remains below the critical value of 350 Å. An average thickness of ~90 Å was calculated here for montmorillonite of bulk samples from X-ray diffraction analysis and lattice-fringe images. However, satisfactory diffraction intensity patterns for quantitative evaluation were obtained only from crystallites with a thickness above the average, which yielded a sufficient scattering volume. These patterns could be described in terms of the kinematic theory and therefore these crystallites were <350 Å thick. Yet, crystallites of adequate thickness were extremely rare in the three samples investigated (Clay Spur, Rock River and Upton, all in Wyoming, USA).

The diffraction intensities from the ab plane of single montmorillonite crystallites of the various origins fit the three structural models for a trans-vacancy distribution, a cis-vacancy distribution or a random-cation distribution within the octahedral sheets. The configuration of the diffraction patterns also shows a 1M symmetry of the layer. Due to the limited data set of CBED patterns, a refinement of the structure could not be achieved. However, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy data and computation of the cation–anion distances and valences using the ‘distance valence least square’ program permitted a refinement of the models.

KEYWORDS: montmorillonite, structure analysis, electron diffraction, CBED







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland