Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; March 2003; v. 38; no. 1; p. 71-94; DOI: 10.1180/0009855033810080
© 2003 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HART, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by GILKES, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Properties of soil kaolins from Thailand

R. D. HART1,2,*, W. WIRIYAKITNATEEKUL1,{dagger} and R. J. GILKES1

1 Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6907, and 2 Materials Research Group, Department of Applied Physics, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Western Australia 6102

* E-mail: r.d.hart{at}exchange.curtin.edu.au

(Received 14 August 2001; revised 20 July 2002)

Purified kaolins from Thai soil on diverse parent materials were characterized using analytical transmission electon microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and chemical analysis. The properties of Thai soil kaolins appear to be more diverse than Indonesian and Western Australian soil kaolins investigated using the same analytical procedures; this difference may reflect the greater range of parent materials for the Thai soils. The kaolins show a variety of crystal morphologies including euhedral hexagonal to subhedral platy crystals, tubes and laths and several morphologies were present in most samples. TEM-EDS enabled analysis of single crystals of each morphology present within a sample. Tubular or lath-shaped crystals usually have lower %Fe2O3 contents than hexagonal platy crystals in the same sample. The relationships between crystal size and Fe content within morphological populations were also examined by TEM-EDS. Generally, smaller kaolin crystals display a wider range of Fe concentration than the larger kaolin crystals in the same sample. Increasing Fe concentration in bulk samples is closely correlated to decreasing coherently scattering domain size (R2 = 0.57), increasing cation exchange capacity (R2 = 0.44) and increasing specific surface area (R2 = 0.65). However the properties of the deferrated soil kaolins, including their Fe content, are not related to forms of Fe, (total Fe, amorphous or organic) in the untreated clay fraction of the soil.

Inhibited vermiculite is a common minor constituent of these clay fractions and its average structural formula derived from EDS data indicates that it was formed by Al replacing K in muscovite. One Al3+ ion occupies the interlayer space previously occupied by three K+ ions. As the distances between these Al3+ cations in the interlayer space is large it is proposed that isolated or loosely associated hydrated Al3+ groups such as Al(OH2)3+ 6 exist that resist exchange by other cations due to hydrogen bonding with the adjacent tetrahedral oxygen surfaces.

KEYWORDS: soil kaolin, analytical TEM, XRD, TGA







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland