Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; September 2002; v. 37; no. 3; p. 551-557; DOI: 10.1180/0009855023730051
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HASHIZUME, H.
Right arrow Articles by YAMAGISHI, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Paper

Adsorption and discrimination of alanine and alanyl-alanine enantiomers by allophane

H. HASHIZUME1, B. K. G. THENG2,* and A. YAMAGISHI3

1 National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan, 2 Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North, New Zealand, and 3 Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan

* E-mail: thengb{at}landcare.cri.nz

We have investigated the adsorption of D- and L-alanine, and their respective dimers, by three allophanes with different Al/Si ratios. The Kanuma (Al/Si = 1.2) and Kitakami (Al/Si = 1.5) allophanes were from Japan whereas the Te Kuiti (Al/Si = 1.6) sample came from New Zealand. The three allophanes differed in their capacity for adsorbing alanine but none of the samples showed a clear preference for either the D- or the L-form. In the case of alanyl-alanine both Kanuma and Kitakami allophanes gave a hint of preferring the L- to the D-enantiomer. On the other hand, the allophane sample from Te Kuiti showed a clear preference for L-alanyl-L-alanine. In keeping with this observation, circular dichroic spectrometry indicated that solutions of a racemic mixture of alanyl-alanine, after equilibration with Te Kuiti allophane, became relatively enriched in the D-enantiomer. The size, intra-molecular charge separation, and surface orientation, of L-alanyl-L-alanine zwitterions apparently combine to confer ‘structural chirality’ to the complex (adduct) with Te Kuiti allophane. As a result, the mineral-organic complex develops a preference for the L-form of alanyl-alanine. This finding points to a possible role of certain allophanes in the origin of biochirality.

KEYWORDS: adsorption, alanine, alanyl-alanine, allophane, enantiomers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
H. Hashizume and B. K. G. Theng
ADENINE, ADENOSINE, RIBOSE AND 5'-AMP ADSORPTION TO ALLOPHANE
Clays and Clay Minerals, December 1, 2007; 55(6): 599 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland