Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; June 2002; v. 37; no. 2; p. 351-366; DOI: 10.1180/0009855023720039
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EGLI, M.
Right arrow Articles by FITZE, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Soil evolution and development of the clay mineral assemblages of a Podzol and a Cambisol in ‘Meggerwald’, Switzerland

M. EGLI1,*, R. ZANELLI1, G. KAHR2, A. MIRABELLA3 and P. FITZE1

1 Department of Physical Geography, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland, 2 Institute of Clay Mineralogy, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland, and 3 Istituto Sperimentale per lo Studio e la Difesa del Suolo, Piazza D’Azeglio 30, 50121 Firenze, Italy

* E-mail: megli{at}geo.unizh.ch

(Received 24 July 2001; revised 26 October 2001)

Two soils, a haplic Podzol and a dystric Cambisol, developed from post-glacial tills, were studied with respect to their soil chemistry and clay mineralogy. Although the state factors (age, geology, topography, climate) of soil formation were almost identical, two different types developed. The E horizon of the Podzol contained more smectite, characterized by a montmorillonite-beidellite-mixed phase. The neoformation of smectite could be traced back to the weathering of mica and chlorite. The Podzol had less hydroxy-interlayered smectite (HIS) in the surface horizons than the Cambisol. A larger amount of chelating compounds in the E horizon of the Podzol either transformed HIS into smectites or inhibited the formation of HIS and favoured the formation of smectites. The physical structure of the soil material is believed to be the most important factor in the different modes of soil evolution. The greater abundance of coarse pores in the topsoil at the Podzol site probably led to a faster eluviation of base cations, a different vegetation at ground level, and, consequently, to a faster soil evolution with the formation of spodic horizons.

KEYWORDS: smectite, beidellite, montmorillonite, soil formation, soil physics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
L. MARINONI, M. SETTI, C. SALVI, and A. LOPEZ-GALINDO
Clay minerals in late Quaternary sediments from the south Chilean margin as indicators of provenance and palaeoclimate
Clay Minerals, June 1, 2008; 43(2): 235 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
M. Skiba
CLAY MINERAL FORMATION DURING PODZOLIZATION IN AN ALPINE ENVIRONMENT OF THE TATRA MOUNTAINS, POLAND
Clays and Clay Minerals, December 1, 2007; 55(6): 618 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland