Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; December 2001; v. 36; no. 4; p. 501-514; DOI: 10.1180/0009855013640005
© 2001 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by APARICIO, P.
Right arrow Articles by FERRELL, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Paper

An application of profile fitting and CLAY++ for the quantitative representation (QR) of mixed-layer clay minerals

P. APARICIO1,* and R. E. FERRELL2,{dagger}

1 Departamento de Cristalografía, Mineralogía y Q. Agrícola, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 553, 41071 Seville, Spain, and 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, E235 Howe Russell Geoscience Complex, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-4101, USA

* E-mail: paparicio{at}us.es

(Received 2 October 2000; revised 4 February 2001)

Clay mineral quantification by XRD is difficult when mixed-layer clay minerals and discrete clay types are both present. New procedures for peak decomposition and pattern simulation offer increased opportunities to obtain mineral abundance estimates. This proposed methodological sequence, for quantitative representation (QR) of complex clay samples, involves: (1) determination of layer type, mixed-layer proportion and order (R); (2) simulation of XRD patterns using MULCALC, an adaptation of NEWMOD; and (3) interpretation of the clay assemblage by fitting the whole pattern with CLAY++, a statistical program. The product is a QR of individual phases or a summation of layer types. The absence of quantitative reference standards means results cannot be checked for accuracy, but the statistical fit is highly reproducible and less prone to operator error. The QRs may be obtained with simulated or actual reference mineral patterns in the database. Results for freshwater marsh samples illustrate the approach.

KEYWORDS: mixed-layer clay minerals, qualitative and quantitative analysis, pattern matching, profile fitting







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland