Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; June 2000; v. 35; no. 3; p. 559-572
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FIALIPS, C.-I.
Right arrow Articles by DECARREAU, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Paper

Hydrothermal formation of kaolinite from various metakaolins

C.-I. FIALIPS, S. PETIT* and A. DECARREAU

Laboratoire Hydr’ASA, UMR6532-CNRS, Université de Poitiers, 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, F-86022 Poitiers Cedex, France

* E-mail: sabine.petit{at}hydrasa.univ-poitiers.fr

(Received 17 June 1999; revised 2 November 1999)

Metakaolins formed by total dehydroxylation of kaolinite, dickite and nacrite were hydrothermally treated at 240°C, for 2, 21 or 182 days, at initial pH = 5–6 or 1. Kaolinite was the only mineral of the kaolin subgroup crystallized in these treatments. Kaolinite is less ordered for pH = 4–6 than for pH = 1. This can be attributed to the influence of specific chemical, morphological, and/or crystalline properties of the metakaolins. Two different processes of kaolinite formation and crystal growth must be involved depending on the pH and metakaolin. The first process implies the dissolution of the metakaolin and crystallization of thin prismatic or dendritic kaolinite particles which curl, probably due to surface tension. The second process implies the rapid formation of small pseudohexagonal kaolinite particles which would aggregate and coalesce to form bigger particles.

KEYWORDS: kaolinite, FTIR, metakaolin, synthesis, TEM, XRD




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C.-I. Fialips, C.-I. Fialips, J. Majzlan, D. Beaufort, and A. Navrotsky
New thermochemical evidence on the stability of dickite vs. kaolinite
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2003; 88(5-6): 837 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
C.-I. Fialips, A. Navrotsky, and S. Petit
Crystal properties and energetics of synthetic kaolinite
American Mineralogist, March 1, 2001; 86(3): 304 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland