Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; June 1999; v. 34; no. 2; p. 291-299
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, U. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jeanroy, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Distribution of manganese in synthetic goethite

U. G. Gasser, R. Nueesch, M. J. Singer, and E. Jeanroy

College of Engineering, Wadenswill, Switzerland

A series of Mn-goethites was synthesized at highly alkaline conditions. The samples were aged for 15 days at a final [KOH] of 0.3 M. Products were washed free from non-goethite phases using 3 M H 2 SO 4 . The bulk mineralogy of the samples was determined by X-ray diffraction and verified on selected individual crystals by electron diffraction. The samples had a relatively low magnetic susceptibility (300 < or = MS < or = 400 X 10 (super -9) m 3 /kg). As revealed by total acid dissolution, the Mn mole fraction X Mn ranged from zero to 0.125. Five samples (X Mn :0.025, 0.050, 0.077, 0.099, 0.125) were selected to investigate the variability of the X Mn value in single goethite needles (crystals) by analytical electron microscopy (AEM) using rastered and spot analyses. Linear regressions of both as a function of total Mn yielded unit slopes and zero intercepts, indicating that acid dissolution gave the same results as AEM. Spot AEM, however, revealed significant variation of Mn distribution within individual crystals which argues in favour of Mn zoning in goethite. Inhomogeneous transformation of ferrihydrite to goethite may partly explain the Mn zoning.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
A. C. Scheinost, H. Stanjek, D. G. Schulze, U. Gasser, and D. L. Sparks
Structural environment and oxidation state of Mn in goethite-groutite solid-solutions
American Mineralogist, January 1, 2001; 86(1-2): 139 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland