Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Clay Minerals Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clay Minerals; June 1997; v. 32; no. 2; p. 271-287
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perruchot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ertus, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

L'halloysite karstique; comparaison des gisements types de Wallonie (Belgique) et du Perigord (France)

A. Perruchot, C. Dupuis, E. Brouard, D. Nicaise, and R. Ertus

Universite Paris Sud, Laboratoire de Geochimie des Roches Sedimentaires, Orsay, France

Two cryptokarstic (covered karsts) halloysitic deposits were compared: the Entre Sambre et Meuse in Belgium and the Perigord in France. Both belong to a continental margin subject to marine transgression and regression cycles which enhance the karstic activity. This geodynamic context appears to be very favourable to the formation of halloysite. The similarity of the geodynamic context of both sites leads to a genetic convergence linked to specific properties of the cryptokarstic system, especially, the ability to collect the percolating waters and to juxtapose the conditions of precipitation, accumulation and maturation of the halloysite silico-aluminous gel precursors. However, each site also displays pronounced specificities relevant to: the nature of the host rock of the halloysite (a partly silicified limestone in the first, a smectite-kaolinite argilite in the second); the aluminium source (allochthonous in the first, relatively autochthonous in the second); and the halloysite content of the deposits (of approximately 100% in the first, and 40% maximum in the second).

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
O. I. ECE, P. A. SCHROEDER, M. J. SMILLEY, and J. M. WAMPLER
Acid-sulphate hydrothermal alteration of andesitic tuffs and genesis of halloysite and alunite deposits in the Biga Peninsula, Turkey
Clay Minerals, June 1, 2008; 43(2): 281 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
E. JOUSSEIN, S. PETIT, J. CHURCHMAN, B. THENG, D. RIGHI, and B. DELVAUX
Halloysite clay minerals -- a review
Clay Minerals, December 1, 2005; 40(4): 383 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland